October 16, 2026

MyFundedFutures Adds Studio #003, a $75 5K Account With a Static Floor

Gourang Parekh

MyFundedFutures added a third Studio plan on 14 October. Studio #003 is a $5,000 evaluation that costs $75 one-time, with a $500 profit target and a $250 static max loss limit.

The firm announced it on X the same day and listed it on myfundedfutures.com/studio alongside the earlier #001 and #002 plans. It sold out for the day within hours, then the firm posted that #001 and #002 were still available.

What Studio #003 actually costs and asks

  • $5,000 account, $75 one-time
  • $500 profit target
  • $250 static max loss limit (never trails)
  • Up to 5 contracts
  • Anytime payout requests, $100 minimum on this size
  • No consistency rule, no daily loss limit, no activation fee, and no minimum trading days stated

It follows the same structure as the first two Studio releases that launched on 7 October. Those used $500 and $1,000 static floors on $10K and $20K labels. #003 just scales the same idea down to a lower entry price and a smaller floor.

A static floor is still the part most traders want. Profit does not drag the loss line up behind you the way a trailing drawdown does. On #003 the floor stays $250 under the starting balance no matter how green the account gets. That is cleaner than the trailing setups on MyFundedFutures Builder, Rapid, or Pro.

The trade-off is the same one the earlier Studio plans carry, just tighter. A $5,000 label with a $250 floor is a $250 account. One bad trade can end it. The page caps size at 5 contracts, which is still plenty of leverage against that floor if someone sizes like the headline number instead of the real money at risk.

The firm also highlighted a trader who went from purchase to evaluation pass to payout in 27 minutes on #003. That matches the rule set (no minimum days, no post-funding wait), but it is one receipt, not a pass rate or a typical timeline.

Our Take: Studio #003 makes the static-floor experiment cheaper to try. It does not change the underlying math. You are still buying a small fixed-floor account dressed as a $5K evaluation. Size to the $250 floor, not the $5,000 label, and it is a clean test of the product. Size to the label and it is just an expensive way to lose $250.

Sources & Evidence

Source confidence: Verified · Last verified: October 15, 2026 · View in Source Registry →
Gourang Parekh

Gourang Parekh

I’ve been trading for over 5 years, mainly across Indian markets, futures, forex, crypto, and CFDs. Over the years, I’ve traded with a lot of different brokers and prop firms and spent a huge amount of time testing their rules, platforms, pricing, drawdown models, payout systems, and trading conditions.

I’ve been through plenty of failed prop firm challenges myself before eventually figuring out what works for me. That experience has given me a pretty practical understanding of what traders actually deal with when choosing a prop firm or trading platform.

Outside of trading, I work with financial content, SEO, and WordPress. I’ve built websites and tools around trading and finance, tested a wide range of trading tools, and even modified Pine Script indicators on TradingView as a hobby.

I write about prop firms, brokers, crypto platforms, and trading tools with a focus on the things that actually matter to traders, including rules, costs, payouts, and the overall trading experience.

Expertise: Prop Firms, Forex Brokers, Futures, Crypto, CFDs, Trading Platforms, Trading Tools, Risk Management

Prop Firm Trader

Gourang Parekh

Gourang Parekh

I’ve been trading for over 5 years, mainly across Indian markets, futures, forex, crypto, and CFDs. Over the years, I’ve traded with a lot of different brokers and prop firms and spent a huge amount of time testing their rules, platforms, pricing, drawdown models, payout systems, and trading conditions. I’ve been through plenty of failed prop firm challenges myself before eventually figuring out what works for me. That experience has given me a pretty practical understanding of what traders actually deal with when choosing a prop firm or trading platform. Outside of trading, I work with financial content, SEO, and WordPress. I’ve built websites and tools around trading and finance, tested a wide range of trading tools, and even modified Pine Script indicators on TradingView as a hobby. I write about prop firms, brokers, crypto platforms, and trading tools with a focus on the things that actually matter to traders, including rules, costs, payouts, and the overall trading experience. Expertise: Prop Firms, Forex Brokers, Futures, Crypto, CFDs, Trading Platforms, Trading Tools, Risk Management

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *